<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steve MacKley design &#187; Fontfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevemackley.com/tag/fontfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevemackley.com</link>
	<description>the portfolio of steve mackley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FontFeed: What the iPad is Missing</title>
		<link>http://stevemackley.com/2010/04/fontfeed-what-the-ipad-is-missing/</link>
		<comments>http://stevemackley.com/2010/04/fontfeed-what-the-ipad-is-missing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve MacKley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fontfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Coles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevemackley.com/?p=1196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Coles of Typographica and The Mid-Century Modernist has posted an interseting critique of the iPad and typography. In short, is disappoints. What the iPad is Missing (No, it’s not a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://fontfeed.com/about/">Stephen Coles</a> of <a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','1','&amp;sig2=5i7Zj6Jv34PHivXn70etNg','0CAsQFjAA')" href="http://typographica.org/"><em>Typographica</em></a> and <a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','1','&amp;sig2=PIfb7o2BhWrDDdbBRppbYA','0CAoQFjAA')" href="http://www.midcenturymodernist.com/">The </a><em><a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','1','&amp;sig2=PIfb7o2BhWrDDdbBRppbYA','0CAoQFjAA')" href="http://www.midcenturymodernist.com/">Mid</a></em><a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','1','&amp;sig2=PIfb7o2BhWrDDdbBRppbYA','0CAoQFjAA')" href="http://www.midcenturymodernist.com/">-</a><em><a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','1','&amp;sig2=PIfb7o2BhWrDDdbBRppbYA','0CAoQFjAA')" href="http://www.midcenturymodernist.com/">Century Modernist</a> </em>has posted an interseting critique of the iPad and typography. In short, is disappoints.</p>
<p><a href="http://fontfeed.com/archives/ipad-typography/  ">What the iPad is Missing (No, it’s not a Camera)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stevemackley.com/2010/04/fontfeed-what-the-ipad-is-missing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TDC2, The Oscars Of Type Design</title>
		<link>http://stevemackley.com/2010/03/tdc2-the-oscars-of-type-design/</link>
		<comments>http://stevemackley.com/2010/03/tdc2-the-oscars-of-type-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve MacKley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fontfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yves Peters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevemackley.com/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TDC2, the annual type design competition organised by the Type Directors Club of New York is about to announce its winners.  Prior to this Yves Peters from the FontFeed examines the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDC2, the annual type design competition organised by the <a href="http://tdc.org/">Type Directors Club of New York</a> is about to announce its winners.  Prior to this <a href="http://fontfeed.com/about/">Yves Peters </a> from the FontFeed examines the TDC2 in a post entitled,<a href="http://fontfeed.com/archives/tdc2-the-oscars-of-type-design/" target="_blank">TDC2, The Oscars Of Type Design</a>. While Mr. Peters is generally positive about the competition, he does outline some of TDC2&#8242;s shortcomings.  Namely:</p>
<ol>
<li>a slight emphasis on display faces,</li>
<li>entry fees limit the ability to get as wide a range of submissions,</li>
<li>the anonymity of submissions makes it  impossible to make out if a submitted typeface is a new creation by a certain designer, or someone emulating his/her signature style,</li>
<li>there is no standard entry form for the type designs,</li>
<li>showy display type tends to get awarded more often than text faces, because the text face rely on subtly and  detail,</li>
<li>jury composition.</li>
</ol>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="TDC2 detail" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2595902160_81b2f437aa.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>I know this may sound like a lot, but these were not overly harsh critiques—and don&#8217;t believe were intended to be. As someone engaged in type design, I would like to see a standard entry form. Plus, I&#8217;d like to see verification that a design is a new creation. On balance the TDC, to me at least, is a great thing, and one I would intend to submit entries to.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Mr Peters has included an <a href="http://fontfeed.com/archives/tdc2-2010-quick-overview-of-the-winners/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fontfeed+%28The+FontFeed%29" target="_self">overview</a> of the winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stevemackley.com/2010/03/tdc2-the-oscars-of-type-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

